
Introduction to this series of posts yesterday explained the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing the appeal of the California AG’s Cease and Desist order against three charities has decided in favor of the charities.
Preliminary ruling
The ALJ concluded that the testimony from the charities’ expert witnesses was more persuasive than that of the AG’s expert witness. On that basis, the ALJ concluded the AG did not prove its case that the financial statements were in violation of GAAP.
I will summarize and quote some of the comments in the transcript and provide select quotes on the assumption many of my readers won’t download and read the transcript for the day. As a matter of my style choice, I will only use the first letter of the last name of witnesses and attorneys.
The basis for conclusion is whose arguments were more persuasive. The ALJ decided the charities had better expert witnesses.
He said:













