Guest post – Determining FMV is difficult. Let’s keep in mind the good that is accomplished by donated meds.

May 24, 2013, 8:33 am

The following is a guest post submitted anonymously. The writer raises some good points and good questions. I’ll post it verbatim except for breaking two large paragraphs into smaller ones for easier reading. I hope the title of the post, written by me, fairly summarizes the ideas. 

One of the cool things about blogging is the ability to provide links to cited sources – if the author would like to forward links for the two quoted sources, I will add them.

Thanks to the author for taking the time to write. Here are his or her thoughts:

Thank you for providing a space for this conversation. I have studied this specific aspect of researching fair market value (FMV) of donated items in depth. As with any discussion we must ensure that we start with the same definition of fair market value.

Accounting guidelines state that FMV is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To bring it into simpler terms, if I am selling apples and you are looking to buy apples, what price can we agree upon?

There are three points that I would make to start the conversation on the valuation of donated goods.

Read the rest of this entry »


Another unsettling thing I’ve learned while blogging – the definition of poverty p0rn

May 24, 2013, 7:37 am

If you want to stretch your brain farther than you thought possible, start blogging.

You can stop laughing now. As a cautious, restrained, introverted CPA, it is usually a half-inch journey to travel the entire distance of my comfort zone.

Starting my own business stretched that zone. Blogging shredded it.

One of the opened frontiers for me was looking at fundraising and international aid in a completely new way. A while back I saw some materials from one of the international aid NGOs. With my new vision I could see the manipulative story and oddities in the video. Evoking pity was the goal throughout.

Having already been stretched, I was able to see things differently. Like noticing every helping face in a brochure was white. Like realizing every needy face was brown or black. Further reflection revealed the only happy black face was next to a newly painted hut (which was probably provided by an aid organization and the cause of the smile).

I now know the name for that:

Read the rest of this entry »


Another call from CCRF

May 23, 2013, 9:42 am

I received another call from Children’s Cancer Recovery Foundation.

This time I could tell it was an automated call. The responses were close to but not quite responsive to my questions. There was also a momentary delay between my question and the response which was longer than a human operator would take.

Read the rest of this entry »


Overview of what churches should include in board minutes

May 23, 2013, 7:58 am

For a quick summary of how to prepare minutes of church board meetings, check out Mastering Minutes for Church Business Meetings at Church Law & Tax. The article is written by Frank and Elaine Sommerville.

Churches often struggle with preparing minutes that are appropriate, helpful, and not dangerous.

Read the full article for a great primer.

Here is what minutes should do: Read the rest of this entry »


Guest post – What about underreporting GIK?

May 22, 2013, 8:09 am

Mr. Jeff Beaumont is a CPA working for a firm that focuses on serving the nonprofit community. His opinions are his own and do not reflect the opinions or positions of his firm in any way. Because he speaks for himself, I won’t identify him or his firm in any more detail. He doesn’t speak for me either.

He has experience as an auditor working on the issues discussed on this blog.  He took me up on my invitation for guest posts, so here is Jeff:

 

by Jeff Beaumont, CPA

There has been quite an amount of discussion, articles, and consideration given to recording gifts in kind.

However, I would like to ask nearly the opposite question: what about organizations that don’t record gifts in kind?

Read the rest of this entry »


Other disclosure issues for GIK medicine

May 20, 2013, 7:03 am

Since starting to write about GIK valuation issues, I’ve noticed there are a few disclosure items that don’t seem to be visible in the financial statements of NPOs who receive large volumes of donated medicines. As I have time, I’ll start accumulating examples.

Concentrations – In general, if a line item of a financial statement contains a concentration, that concentration should be disclosed. The concept is one donor or lender or customer or vendor could go away. If loss of one counter-party would adversely impact an organization, the concentration should be visible. For example, if a huge portion of cash contributions come from just a couple of donors, that probably should be disclosed.

Concentration of revenueRead the rest of this entry »


Explain to me again why targeting NPOs was needed because the Determination Unit was swamped by the overwhelming flood of (c)(4) applications

May 17, 2013, 6:20 am

The huge increase in 501(c)(4) applications is the cited reason for targeting some applications for additional review.

Two problems with that explanation.

First, the increase of (c)(4) applications in 2011 and 2012 is a very small portion of Determination Unit caseload.

Second, the ideological targeting started well before the volume of applications increased.

Increase in (c)(4) applications was cause for targeted review

Appendix I (page 22) of the TIGTA report identifies objective I of the investigation as: Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers