Nonprofit finance, accounting, and tax news. Other tidbits of interest to the charity community.
Previous posts introduced the simple/complicated/complex/chaotic quadrants of the Cynefin Framework and discussed how that can be used to analyze development issues.
Implications for economics
This framework has huge implications for discussions of economic issues. So many areas come to mind that are actually complex but we treat them as if they are complicated.
Previous posts introduced the Cynefin framework and described a bit of how it helps make sense.
Where it gets messy
Distinguishing between the complicated and complex quadrants is the biggest challenge.
As I ponder the Cynefin framework, I realize that distinction is the cause of many heated differences of opinion.
It is also the cause of many unintended consequences. I’ve talked about that a lot on my blogs.
Applying the solutions from the complicated quadrant to issues in the complex quadrant is the conceptual cause of most of the harm from those unintended consequences.
Previous post introduced the four quadrants of the Cynefin Framework: simple, complicated, complex, and chaotic.
One of the major implications of the framework is to highlight that the world is not neatly ordered.
In addition, leadership styles need to change based on the nature of the situation.
Boundaries
For the last week I’ve been pondering a new tool to help understand the world around me. It’s called a sense-making model by its inventor.
The Cynefin Framework was developed by David Snowden. It’s pronounced cunevin or ku-nev’-in.
This series of posts will give an overview, provide two links to videos, and apply the model to several areas.
The model has four quadrants. The primary driver is how the relationship between cause and effect changes based on the nature of the situation.
Simple