More examples of unintended consequences

Five more examples of unintended consequences.  The problem? People don’t always do what you tell them. They often do something totally different from what you expected.

Cracked describes 5 Laws That Made Senses on Paper (And Disasters in Reality). (Caution, moderate number of naughty words.) These examples are from government.  My three favorites are how to:

  • increase number of guns on the street
  • increase number of cobras on the loose
  • increase pollution from cars

Gun buybacks increase number of guns on the street. Because such program don’t look at the value of weapons bought back, the process can provide a far above market value price. That provides liquidity that can be used to buy something else, like groceries. Or drugs. Or a higher quality gun. Or a legal gun. One cited study showed buyback programs increase number of guns in circulation.

Since weapons are not checked to see if they are even functional (at least in my area), some portion of the weapons “taken off the street” are actually no more dangerous than a brick.

Bounty on cobra skins increase number of cobras on the loose because the British government in India set the bounty above the cost of breeding cobras. Result? Some people bred cobras for the bounty. When the rulers figured that out they cut the bounty and the breeders turned loose their cobras.

Ban on driving cars based on last digit of license plate in order to reduce pollution actually increased pollution in Mexico. Quite simple explanation. People would buy an old beater to drive on the day they couldn’t driver their primary car, thus still driving on the so-called ‘banned’ days but doing so with a more polluting vehicle.

Check out the article for more, such as fines levied at the shore on the excess amount of fish brought to shore in fishing boats results in the excess amount getting dumped in the ocean instead of being brought back to shore.

(Hat tip: Carpe Diem)

2 Responses to More examples of unintended consequences

  1. empoprises says:

    There are unintended consequences that even Cracked did not discern. Take one of the five items that you didn’t mention (how tightening bankruptcy laws eventually led to the bankruptcy of Washington Mutual, according to Cracked).

    I know someone who purchased a bank-repossessed house. By the time he actually took possession of the repo, the home had been graffiti-damaged by the evicted owner. After all, what did the evicted owner have to lose?

    Eventually the person purchased another house – a newly built house with no graffiti problems.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: