An illustration why interpreting functional allocation information is difficult: the Wounded Warrior Project financials

October 24, 2014, 8:33 am

Apparently there is conflict going around on how to interpret the functional expense allocation information for Wounded Warrior Project.

All their info is laid out in their audited financial statements, which you can find here. Their annual report, audited financial statements, and 990s for the last eight years are all available on their website. Good on them for making all that info readily available. That is an example for all charities to follow.

How can three different calculations all be correct?

Read the rest of this entry »


More good stuff on overhead ratios and impact 8/5

August 5, 2014, 7:11 am

Here are a few more articles in the ongoing conversation of overhead and the “worst charities.”

Good discussions are developing on the Alliance for Charitable Trust Linked-In group. That’s where I found two of the following articles.

3/24 – Skoll world forum – Reimagining the ‘overhead’ debate- Article provides an example of full costing instead of ‘overhead’ ratios. The organization calculated the grand total of cost for their program in Malawi is $885,767. They then provided three paragraphs explaining what that $886K accomplished. Great illustration of outputs with several outcomes included in the narrative instead of a supporting services ratio. Donors can make their own decision whether that program deserves their support. Read the rest of this entry »


It’s complicated. Evaluating charities and doing business in China version. Part 2

July 22, 2014, 6:59 am

First post in this series looked at another illustration of the complexity of doing business or ministry in China.

This blog has looked several times at the issue of how complicated life is.

This post ponders complexity in terms of how to evaluate and compare charities that have vastly different operating circumstances.

Complexity of evaluating charities

Read the rest of this entry »


More good stuff on overhead ratios and “worst charities.” 7/16

July 16, 2014, 8:14 am

Here are a few more articles in the ongoing conversation of overhead and the “worst charities.”

“Overhead ratio”

7/11 – Chronicle of Philanthropy – Wounded Warrior CEO Rips Rating Systems as ‘Ineffective and Misinformed’ - CEO says Wounded Warrior could have modified their operations to manage the overhead ratio, but they choose instead to focus on long-term service to their community, which involved upfront costs and other efforts that affected ratios. They disagree with the attitude that overhead is bad and fundraising is either a sign of inefficiency or fraud. In the tell me how you really feel category, the CEO says this of the rating agencies:

“Essentially what these groups are doing is passing judgment on decisions that were made by charity boards and staff on how to best fulfill their missions, meet the needs of their constituencies, and sustain their organizations over the long term,” he said.

He also mentions what few others will discuss: not all charities are completely honest in their functional allocations.

7/15 – Huffington Post – Measuring Charity Effectiveness: Manage Your Mission, Not Your Rating - Steve Nardizzi, CEO of Wounded Warrior Project goes in-depth on why the overhead ratios and rating agency methodology is out of line. This is a must read if you have been following the overhead debate. Several quotes:

The two main issues with ratings agencies (sentence diagrammed by me for emphasis): Read the rest of this entry »


Free class on how charities account for expenses

April 17, 2014, 8:37 am

Learn All About Nonprofit Expense Accounting on May 1 is the announcement from Sift Media of another free webinar on NPO accounting. The class is Expense Accounting – Key Accounting and Reporting Issues for Nonprofits #3.

The free class is one hour long and will be offered on May 1, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern. That means 11:00 here on the west coast.

Some of the topics covered will be the functional allocation of expenses and joint cost allocation.

Read the rest of this entry »


Portion of telemarketing proceeds retained by charities in Michigan

March 14, 2014, 9:04 am

Previously mentioned that in 2012 California charities retained 37% of the total proceeds raised by telemarketing firms. In New York, the percentage going to the charities was 38%.

The Michigan Attorney General released their report on telemarketing campaigns in the state for 2013 –  

Read the rest of this entry »


Portion of telemarketing proceeds retained by charities in CA and NY during 2012

March 1, 2014, 8:00 am

What portion of telemarketing campaigns makes its way to charities for whom the campaigns were conducted?

Here’s the 2012 results based on two recent articles:

  • New York – charities retained about 38%
  • California – charities retained about 37%

The articles:

Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 92 other followers