SSARS 19 report titles and salutations

Update – SSARS 19 had been replaced by SSARS 21. All the reports have been revised. You can check out these posts at my other blog, Attestation Update:

SSARS 19, which goes into effect the end of 2010, specifies titles and addressing for compilation and review reports.

Comp report title

For compilation reports, the title should* reflect what kind of report is issued, specifically a comp.  SSARS 19 suggests two examples in paragraph 2.17a:  “Accountant’s Compilation Report” along with “Independent Accountant’s Compilation Report”.

Since I don’t perform any non-independent comps, I’ll add the word “independent” to all my reports.

If you have some non-independent reporting situations, it seems to me that you have two options:  First, add or delete the “independent” based on the circumstance of each engagement.  Second, you could drop the use of the word “independent” on every comp report as a routine step.  The first approach might be more accurate and useful.  However, seems you will set yourself up for a glitch someday when you forgot to drop the word and thus could be criticized (for example, taking heat from a peer reviewer, internal inspector, or jury).

Review report title

For review reports, the title should* reflect that it is a review and should* contain the word independent.  So the title of a review report suggested by SSARS 19 is “Independent Accountant’s Review Report” in 3.28a.

Addressee

For both comps and reviews, the reports should* “be addressed as appropriate in the circumstances of the engagement”.  Neither SSARS 19 nor the 2010/11 Compilation and Review Alert give detail on what this means.  It seems obvious to me that in addition to identifying the organization, there would be an appropriate salutation, such as Dear Board members, or To the Stockholders, or Dear Owners.  SSARS 19 uses the word addressee, while the Compilation and Review Alert uses the word salutation.  I suggest you determine a framework as a firm and consistently apply that policy.

It seems to me the change here is moving from a report to correspondence.  Don’t know if that is the actual thought process, but that is how I am conceptualizing it. 

(see extended discussion for reason for change on 11-19-11 at this post)

I have provided the comp and review reports I will be using with SSARS 19.

Important footnote!

* – be aware the use of the word “should” is a loaded expression, meaning what follows in SSARS 19 or follow on pronouncements is a presumptively mandatory requirement.  I used that “should” word intentionally!  The “should” is in SSARS 19.  If this is a new comment to you, it would be wise to quickly read paragraph 1.11 of SSARS 19. This is discussed in more detail here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: