<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPA withholds clean opinion from NPO that values GIK meds at AWP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonprofitupdate.info/2012/08/15/cpa-withholds-clean-opinion-from-npo-that-values-gik-meds-at-awp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonprofitupdate.info/2012/08/15/cpa-withholds-clean-opinion-from-npo-that-values-gik-meds-at-awp/</link>
	<description>Nonprofit finance, accounting, and tax news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ulvog</title>
		<link>http://nonprofitupdate.info/2012/08/15/cpa-withholds-clean-opinion-from-npo-that-values-gik-meds-at-awp/#comment-3109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Ulvog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 23:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ulvog.wordpress.com/?p=2786#comment-3109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree.  Furthermore, I think the cost of the purchases is visible on the 990. That makes the overall markup 33x the amount paid.  The same note also says all the meds obtained in 2011 and 2010 were bargain purchases. No outright donations.  There is still much to discuss in the financial statements.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Furthermore, I think the cost of the purchases is visible on the 990. That makes the overall markup 33x the amount paid.  The same note also says all the meds obtained in 2011 and 2010 were bargain purchases. No outright donations.  There is still much to discuss in the financial statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewToSeattle</title>
		<link>http://nonprofitupdate.info/2012/08/15/cpa-withholds-clean-opinion-from-npo-that-values-gik-meds-at-awp/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewToSeattle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ulvog.wordpress.com/?p=2786#comment-3107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s even more interesting to me is the statement in Footnote No. 3 of the audited financial statement that &quot;bargain purchase prices ... have historical been equated to donations.&quot; This seems to be an explicit acknowledgment--the first time I have seen it in formal financials--that the nonprofit accounting industry long has covered up its open-market purchases of medical supplies by falsely calling them &quot;donations.&quot; This is huge!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s even more interesting to me is the statement in Footnote No. 3 of the audited financial statement that &#8220;bargain purchase prices &#8230; have historical been equated to donations.&#8221; This seems to be an explicit acknowledgment&#8211;the first time I have seen it in formal financials&#8211;that the nonprofit accounting industry long has covered up its open-market purchases of medical supplies by falsely calling them &#8220;donations.&#8221; This is huge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
